LawBites
← Back to Property Law

Conditions Restraining Alienation

Introduction

Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 deals with conditions that restrict a transferee (person receiving property) from transferring it further.

The law aims to ensure free transferability (free movement) of property and prevents unreasonable restrictions.


Meaning / Definition

A condition restraining alienation means a condition that limits or restricts the transferee from transferring (selling or disposing) the property.

Rule:

  • An absolute restraint (complete restriction) on transfer is void (not valid).
  • A partial restraint (limited restriction) is valid.

Even if the condition is void, the transfer itself remains valid.


Modes or Types

Absolute Restraint

  • Completely restricts the transferee from transferring property.
  • Such a condition is void.

Example:

  • Transfer with condition that transferee cannot sell without permission.

Partial Restraint

  • Restricts transfer only in a limited manner.
  • Such a condition is valid.

Examples:

  • Transfer restricted only within family.
  • Restriction against selling to a specific person.

Determination of Restraint

  • Whether restraint is absolute or partial depends on:
    • Intention of the transferor
    • Terms of the document

Scope of Section 10

  • Applies only to transfers by act of parties (voluntary transfers).
  • Does not apply to:
    • Transfers by operation of law
    • Court sales (execution of decree)
    • Partition or family settlement

Exceptions

Lease

  • In a lease, a condition restricting sub-letting or assignment is valid.
  • This applies even in long-term leases.

Married Women (Limited Application)

  • A restraint on alienation may be valid in case of transfer to a married Christian woman during coverture (period of marriage).
  • Not applicable to Hindus, Muslims, or Buddhists.

Important Case Law

  • Mohammed Raza v. Abbas Bandi (Privy Council)

    • Condition restricting sale outside family was held valid (partial restraint).
  • T.V. Sangam Ltd. v. Shanmuga Sundaram (Madras High Court)

    • Condition restricting sale within family at fixed low price was held void (absolute restraint).
  • Attwater v. Attwater (1853)

    • Restriction limiting transfer within a class (brothers) held void.
  • Sarju Bala v. Jyotirmoyee (Privy Council)

    • Restriction on gift except for limited religious purpose held void.

Distinction / Comparison

BasisAbsolute RestraintPartial Restraint
NatureComplete restrictionLimited restriction
ValidityVoidValid
EffectCondition ignoredCondition enforced
ExampleNo sale allowed at allSale allowed within family

Practical Example

  • A transfers property to B with condition that B cannot sell it at all. This condition is void.
  • A transfers property to B with condition that B cannot sell to outsiders. This is valid.
  • A leases property with condition that tenant cannot sublet. This is valid.
  • A transfers property with condition to sell only at very low price. This may be treated as absolute restraint and be void.

Summary

  • Section 10 deals with restrictions on transfer of property.
  • Absolute restraint on transfer is void.
  • Partial restraint is valid.
  • Transfer remains valid even if condition is void.
  • Section applies only to voluntary transfers.
  • Lease restrictions are valid exceptions.
  • Determination depends on intention and terms of document.