Conditions Restraining Alienation
Introduction
Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 deals with conditions that restrict a transferee (person receiving property) from transferring it further.
The law aims to ensure free transferability (free movement) of property and prevents unreasonable restrictions.
Meaning / Definition
A condition restraining alienation means a condition that limits or restricts the transferee from transferring (selling or disposing) the property.
Rule:
- An absolute restraint (complete restriction) on transfer is void (not valid).
- A partial restraint (limited restriction) is valid.
Even if the condition is void, the transfer itself remains valid.
Modes or Types
Absolute Restraint
- Completely restricts the transferee from transferring property.
- Such a condition is void.
Example:
- Transfer with condition that transferee cannot sell without permission.
Partial Restraint
- Restricts transfer only in a limited manner.
- Such a condition is valid.
Examples:
- Transfer restricted only within family.
- Restriction against selling to a specific person.
Determination of Restraint
- Whether restraint is absolute or partial depends on:
- Intention of the transferor
- Terms of the document
Scope of Section 10
- Applies only to transfers by act of parties (voluntary transfers).
- Does not apply to:
- Transfers by operation of law
- Court sales (execution of decree)
- Partition or family settlement
Exceptions
Lease
- In a lease, a condition restricting sub-letting or assignment is valid.
- This applies even in long-term leases.
Married Women (Limited Application)
- A restraint on alienation may be valid in case of transfer to a married Christian woman during coverture (period of marriage).
- Not applicable to Hindus, Muslims, or Buddhists.
Important Case Law
-
Mohammed Raza v. Abbas Bandi (Privy Council)
- Condition restricting sale outside family was held valid (partial restraint).
-
T.V. Sangam Ltd. v. Shanmuga Sundaram (Madras High Court)
- Condition restricting sale within family at fixed low price was held void (absolute restraint).
-
Attwater v. Attwater (1853)
- Restriction limiting transfer within a class (brothers) held void.
-
Sarju Bala v. Jyotirmoyee (Privy Council)
- Restriction on gift except for limited religious purpose held void.
Distinction / Comparison
| Basis | Absolute Restraint | Partial Restraint |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Complete restriction | Limited restriction |
| Validity | Void | Valid |
| Effect | Condition ignored | Condition enforced |
| Example | No sale allowed at all | Sale allowed within family |
Practical Example
- A transfers property to B with condition that B cannot sell it at all. This condition is void.
- A transfers property to B with condition that B cannot sell to outsiders. This is valid.
- A leases property with condition that tenant cannot sublet. This is valid.
- A transfers property with condition to sell only at very low price. This may be treated as absolute restraint and be void.
Summary
- Section 10 deals with restrictions on transfer of property.
- Absolute restraint on transfer is void.
- Partial restraint is valid.
- Transfer remains valid even if condition is void.
- Section applies only to voluntary transfers.
- Lease restrictions are valid exceptions.
- Determination depends on intention and terms of document.